Comparison of Clonazepam and Tongue Protector in the Treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: BMS is a chronic pain syndrome affecting the oral mucosa. It consists of experiencing a burning or dysesthetic sensation. BMS prevalence varies, with up to 15% among women. An effective treatment is still unattainable. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with BMS qualified for a randomised trial, divided in two groups: the clonazepam-treated and tongue protector group. Treatment was provided for 4 weeks in both groups. In the former, the oral dosage of clonazepam 0.5 mg; in the latter, a tongue protector was used. Clinical oral examination was performed, and the presence of taste disorder and pain intensity, on the visual analogues scale, were recorded. Psychological domains were explored with the Beck depression inventory (depression), Athens insomnia scale (insomnia), Eyesenck personality questionnaire-revised (personality traits), and WHO quality of life questionnaire (quality of life). RESULTS: Complete recovery was observed in three patients after clonazepam and one patient after tongue guard treatment. A greater improvement in the VAS scores, from baseline to the control values, was demonstrated in the clonazepam group, and it was statistically significant. In women, the level of depression significantly correlated with all domains of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: BMS is an ongoing multi-specialist challenge. The development of new pathophysiological concepts of BMS offers hope for more effective treatment. Considering the influence of BMS on the quality of life and mental disorders in most patients, further research on the possibilities of therapy seems to be very important.

Postinfectious SARS-CoV-2 Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (OMAS) represents a pathophysiology and diagnostic challenge. Although the diverse etiologies likely share a common mechanism to generate ocular, trunk, and limb movements, the underlying cause may be a paraneoplastic syndrome, as the first sign of cancer, or may be a postinfectious complication, and thus, the outcome depends on identifying the trigger mechanism. A recent hypothesis suggests increased GABAA receptor sensitivity in the olivary-oculomotor vermis-fastigial nucleus-premotor saccade burst neuron circuit in the brainstem. Therefore, OMAS management will focus on immunosuppression and modulation of GABAA hypersensitivity with benzodiazepines. METHODS: We serially video recorded the eye movements at the bedside of 1 patient with SARS-CoV-2-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum antibodies, but twice-negative nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We tested cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, and nasopharyngeal samples. After brain MRI and chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT scans, we treated our patient with clonazepam and high-dose Solu-MEDROL, followed by a rituximab infusion after her formal eye movement analysis 10 days later. RESULTS: The recordings throughout her acute illness demonstrated different eye movement abnormalities. While on high-dose steroids and clonazepam, she initially had macrosaccadic oscillations, followed by brief ocular flutter during convergence the next day; after 10 days, she had bursts of opsoclonus during scotopic conditions with fixation block but otherwise normal eye movements. Concern for a suboptimal response to high-dose Solu-MEDROL motivated an infusion of rituximab, which induced remission. An investigation for a paraneoplastic etiology was negative. CSF testing showed elevated neuron-specific enolase. Serum IgG to Serum SARS-CoV2 IgG was elevated with negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal testing. CONCLUSION: A recent simulation model of macrosaccadic oscillations and OMAS proposes a combined pathology of brainstem and cerebellar because of increased GABAA receptor sensitivity. In this case report, we report 1 patient with elevated CSF neuronal specific enolase, macrosaccadic oscillations, ocular flutter, and OMAS as a SARS-CoV-2 postinfectious complication. Opsoclonus emerged predominantly with fixation block and suppressed with fixation, providing support to modern theories on the mechanism responsible for these ocular oscillations involving cerebellar-brainstem pathogenesis.

Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome (OMAS) Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Post-Infectious Neurological Complication with Benign Prognosis.

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2) is the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic [5]. SARS-Cov-2 demonstrates partial resemblance to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV in phylogenetic analysis, clinical manifestations, and pathological findings [6, 7]. Reports emerging from China have described ataxia as a neurological symptom of the SARS-CoV-2 infection [5]. Opsoclonus consists of back-to-back multidirectional conjugate saccades without an inter-saccadic interval [8]. Myoclonus is defined as a sudden, brief, "shock-like", nonepileptic involuntary movement [9], which has been described as a symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection [10]. Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia syndrome (OMAS) associated COVID-19 infection has been reported recently [1112].

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, a post-infectious neurologic complication of COVID-19: case series and review of literature.

Opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome is a heterogeneous constellation of symptoms ranging from full combination of these three neurological findings to varying degrees of isolated individual sign. Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), neurological symptoms, syndromes, and complications associated with this multi-organ viral infection have been reported and the various aspects of neurological involvement are increasingly uncovered. As a neuro-inflammatory disorder, one would expect to observe opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome after a prevalent viral infection in a pandemic scale, as it has been the case for many other neuro-inflammatory syndromes. We report seven cases of opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome presumably parainfectious in nature and discuss their phenomenology, their possible pathophysiological relationship to COVID-19, and diagnostic and treatment strategy in each case. Finally, we review the relevant data in the literature regarding the opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome and possible similar cases associated with COVID-19 and its diagnostic importance for clinicians in various fields of medicine encountering COVID-19 patients and its complications.